Procurement · risk · supervision
We read cloud and AI vendor terms like integration engineers—not like marketing copy—because retention, subprocessors, cross-border routing, and “improve our services” language are where confidentiality and supervision expectations actually meet the contract. This is work we do alongside client counsel and procurement: an evidence map, not a definitive legal verdict.
Firm Leverage is not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice—your licensed advisors own sufficiency under your bar, client duties, and deal terms.
Want to help ship this?
This build leans hard on deterministic checks and agent choreography—there's machinery inside worth pairing with disciplined humans.
Use the lane that fits whether you vibe with agents or just ruthless clause mapping.
Coming · May 31
Real vendor terms also carry liability, indemnity, SLAs, acceptable use, IP, governing law, and dozens of other clauses. Those are still in scope for diligence—we surface and organize them in the full evidence map. The four buckets above are the spine for where matter-adjacent data, retention, routing, and supervision expectations meet the contract.
Output is structured so your counsel can say what holds in your jurisdiction and for a given matter—not so a vendor slide deck wins by default.
Coming · May 31
Paste a vendor ToS URL or the terms text, choose which Firm
Leverage comparison baseline to run it against from the profiles we ship, and the lens does
the structured pass—you get the evidence map, not a consulting deck about process.
Book a Call
Helpful Words →